Key result
Higher walking cardiac force index is linked to better relaxed and straining G tolerance in aircrew.
Why the study?
No definite cardiac information measured using a mobile health device existed for analyzing G tolerance in military aircrew.
Does the cardiac force index (CFI) measured by a mobile device predict G tolerance in military aircrew?
Observational (n=213)
Does the cardiac force index (CFI) measured by a mobile device predict G tolerance in military aircrew?
The walking cardiac force index measured by a wearable device can be used to predict G tolerance in military aircrew prior to centrifuge training.
CFI via wearables may inform pilot G-tolerance assessment; leaves open validation and outcome impact in prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: During flight, G force compels blood to stay in leg muscles and reduces blood flow to the heart. Cardiovascular responses activated by the autonomic nerve system and strengthened by anti-G straining maneuvers can alleviate the challenges faced during G loading. To our knowledge, no definite cardiac information measured using a mobile health device exists for analyzing G tolerance. However, our previous study developed the cardiac force index (CFI) for analyzing the G tolerance of military aircrew. OBJECTIVE: This study used the CFI to verify participants' cardiac performance when walking and obtained a formula for predicting an individual's G tolerance during centrifuge training. METHODS: Participants from an air force aircrew undertook high-G training from January 2020 to December 2022. Their heart rate (HR) in beats per minute and activity level per second were recorded using the wearable BioHarness 3.0 device. The CFI was computed using the following formula: weight × activity / HR during resting or walking. Relaxed G tolerance (RGT) and straining G tolerance (SGT) were assessed at a slowly increasing rate of G loading (0.1 G/s) during training. Other demographic factors were included in the multivariate regression to generate a model for predicting G tolerance from the CFI. RESULTS: A total of 213 eligible trainees from a military aircrew were recruited. The average age was 25.61 (SD 3.66) years, and 13.1% (28/213) of the participants were women. The mean resting CFI and walking CFI (WCFI) were 0.016 (SD 0.001) and 0.141 (SD 0.037) kg × G/beats per minute, respectively. The models for predicting RGT and SGT were as follows: RGT = 0.066 × age + 0.043 × (WCFI × 100) - 0.037 × height + 0.015 × systolic blood pressure - 0.010 × HR + 7.724 and SGT = 0.103 × (WCFI × 100) - 0.069 × height + 0.018 × systolic blood pressure + 15.899. Thus, the WCFI is a positive factor for predicting the RGT and SGT before centrifuge training. CONCLUSIONS: The WCFI is a vital component of the formula for estimating G tolerance prior to training. The WCFI can be used to monitor physiological conditions against G stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuo et al. (2023) conducted an observational in G tolerance in military aircrew (n=213). Walking Cardiac Force Index (WCFI) was evaluated on Relaxed G tolerance (RGT) and straining G tolerance (SGT). The walking cardiac force index (mean 0.141 kg × G/bpm) was identified as a positive predictive factor for both relaxed and straining G tolerance in military aircrew before centrifuge training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: