Key result
Higher walking cardiac force index linked to ~0.14G greater relaxed G tolerance per 100 units.
Why the study?
There was no prior study monitoring the cardiac force index by wearable devices during the G tolerance test among military aircrew.
Does walking Cardiac Force Index (WCFI) correlate with G tolerance in military aircrew?
Observational (n=92)
Does walking Cardiac Force Index (WCFI) correlate with G tolerance in military aircrew?
Effect estimate: 0.14G increase in RGT per 100-unit increase in WCFI (95% CI 0.09 to 0.19)
Walking Cardiac Force Index measured by a wearable device is positively correlated with G tolerance in military aircrew, suggesting potential utility for aircrew selection.
May support mHealth CFI monitoring feasibility in aircrew; leaves open predictive value for G-tolerance pending validation.
BACKGROUND Military aircrew are occupationally exposed to a high-G environment. G force causes blood to flow to the lower body region and challenges their cardiac function and anti-G straining maneuver effectiveness. A tolerance test is necessary for every military aircrew member before undergoing flight training. A novel cardiac force index (CFI) has been developed and used to assess long-distance running by mobile health (mHealth) technology. There is still no study to monitor the CFI by wearable devices during the G tolerance test. OBJECTIVE We added the cardiac function parameter CFI to the G tolerance test and elucidated the relationship between cardiac function and G tolerance among military aircrew. METHODS A noninvasive device, BioHarness 3.0, was used to measure heart rate (HR) and activity while resting and walking on the ground. The mathematical formula for cardiac function calculation is CFI = weight × activity/HR. The cardiac force ratio (CFR) is calculated by walking CFI (WCFI)/resting CFI (RCFI). G tolerance includes relaxed G tolerance (RGT) and straining G tolerance (SGT) tested by a human centrifuge under the gradual-onset-rate profile. RESULTS In total, 92 male participants voluntarily completed this study. The average values of RCFI, WCFI, and CFR were 0.02 [SD 0.04], 0.15 [SD 0.04], and 10.77 [SD 4.11], respectively. The mean RGT and SGT were 5.1G [SD 0.9] and 7.8G [SD 1.1], respectively, in the centrifuge. The percentages of participants with RGT greater than 5G or SGT greater than 8G were equally noted as 54.3%. Each 100-unit increase in WCFI increased RGT by 0.14G [SE 0.02, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.19] and by 0.17G [SE 0.03, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.22], corresponding to SGT. In addition, there was an increased chance of RGT values higher than 5G and SGT values higher than 8G according to the increase in WCFI. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggested that WCFI is positively correlated with G tolerance in the centrifuge and has the potential to be used for military aircrew selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiang et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Military aircrew undergoing G tolerance test (n=92). Walking Cardiac Force Index (WCFI) was evaluated on Relaxed G tolerance (RGT) and straining G tolerance (SGT) (0.14G increase in RGT per 100-unit increase in WCFI, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.19). Each 100-unit increase in walking cardiac force index was associated with a 0.14G increase in relaxed G tolerance (95% CI 0.09-0.19) and a 0.17G increase in straining G tolerance (95% CI 0.11-0.22).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: