Why the study?
Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and the role of ARBs in treating essential hypertension and preventing cardiovascular events requires comprehensive evaluation.
Does angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARBs) therapy prevent cardiovascular events and improve comorbidities in adult patients with essential hypertension compared to other common antihypertensive drugs?
Does angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARBs) therapy prevent cardiovascular events and improve comorbidities in adult patients with essential hypertension compared to other common antihypertensive drugs?
This review summarizes the efficacy, safety, and role of ARBs in treating essential hypertension and preventing its cardiovascular and systemic complications.
Hypertension has a worldwide high incidence in the general population and undoubtedly it is the most important risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, in industrialized countries. In this Review we investigated the role of angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARBs) therapy in the treatment of essential hypertension. We selected in the PubMed and in a list of selected sources the most significant clinical trials and meta-analysis carried out from 1999 to now, to assess, in adult patients populations, ARBs' efficacy, safety and tolerability profile, in comparison with the efficacy of the other common antihypertensive drugs, with particular regard to both the prevention of disabling consequences of hypertension (like cerebrovascular events, coronary events and heart failure) and the influence of an adequate antihypertensive therapy on comorbidities which strongly influence the outcome of hypertensive patients (like atherosclerosis, kidney damage, type II diabetes mellitus and arrhythmias). We also evaluated, in a detailed pharmacological and pharmaco-economic analysis, the basilar differences between ACE-inhibitors and ARBs in the control of the RAA system, and we assessed the possible benefits of their associated use, according to the new evidences concerning the treatment of arterial hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Novo et al. (2009) conducted a review in essential hypertension. angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARBs) vs. other common antihypertensive drugs was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: