Key result
Bronchoscopy-guided internal cooled-radiofrequency ablation had no complications, whereas standard noncooled-RFA was complicated by bronchial bleeding in sheep lungs.
Why the study?
Does bronchoscopy-guided internal cooled-RFA improve safety and effectiveness compared to standard noncooled-RFA in normal sheep lungs?
Does bronchoscopy-guided internal cooled-RFA improve safety and effectiveness compared to standard noncooled-RFA in normal sheep lungs?
Bronchoscopy-guided internal cooled-radiofrequency ablation is a safe and feasible procedure in a sheep model, avoiding the bronchial bleeding associated with standard noncooled-RFA.
The aim of the current study was to assess the safety of bronchoscopy-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and compare the effectiveness between new internal cooled-RFA and standard noncooled-RFA. Normal lungs from sheep were used (n=6). Internal cooled-RFA and standard noncooled-RFA were set to assess the most suitable RFA conditions, such as power output, flow rate and ablation time. Internal cooled-RFA was then applied under the most optimal conditions of power output and flow rate for 15, 30, 60 and 120 s, and two water temperatures either room temperature (RT) water or cold water. Criteria for the most appropriate conditions were set over 15 s of ablation time and 50 degrees C of the tip's temperature. Internal cooled-RFA had no complications. Standard noncooled-RFA was complicated with bronchial bleeding after RFA. On the basis of the histological findings, average temperature and average output, the most appropriate conditions of the cooled-RFA were a power output of 30 W and flow rate of 30 or 40 mL.min(-1). The cooled-RFA using cold water caused a smaller, more discrete, lesion compared with that using RT water. Bronchoscopy-guided internal cooled-radiofrequency ablation was an effective, safe and feasible procedure that could become a potential therapeutic tool in managing lung pathology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsushima et al. (2007) studied Normal lungs (n=6). Internal cooled-radiofrequency ablation (RFA) vs. Standard noncooled-RFA was evaluated on Safety and effectiveness (complications, histological findings, temperature, output). Bronchoscopy-guided internal cooled-radiofrequency ablation had no complications, whereas standard noncooled-RFA was complicated by bronchial bleeding in sheep lungs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: