Key result
ICU doctors assess VTE risk in only ~68% of patients at admission.
Why the study?
The 2009 China ICU prevention guidelines lack VTE risk assessment, and ICU doctors have limited awareness of VTE management.
Cross-Sectional
Yes
A survey of ICU doctors in Zhejiang, China reveals limited awareness and high heterogeneity in VTE risk assessment, indicating a need for updated guidelines.
Suboptimal VTE assessment awareness among surveyed ICU physicians warrants targeted education; leaves open generalizability and outcome impact.
BACKGROUND The 2009 China Intensive Care Units (ICU) prevention guidelines lack venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment. This survey was conducted to assess the risk of VTE, develop and establish a diagnosis, and provide prevention and treatment guidelines for ICU VTE. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional questionnaire survey of ICU doctors ICUs was conducted online in the tertiary and secondary hospitals of Zhejiang province in China. The questionnaire included VTE-related hospital hardware information, VTE awareness, knowledge, and monitoring system. RESULTS The risk assessment rates at the time of admission and changed disease condition were 67.7% and 60.4%, respectively. D-dimer and ultrasound were commonly used for VTE screening. Heparin is preferred for short-term intravenous anticoagulant therapy, and warfarin is preferred for long-term therapy. We found that 23.53% of the ICUs have bedside ultrasound and staff for ultrasound examination, and 59.4% of the hospitals are equipped with VTE monitoring information systems. The VTE early identification specification is the key to whether the VTE assessment is performed after the patient enters the ICU. CONCLUSIONS The survey assessed the VTE risk and key VTE management elements. However, high heterogeneities were detected in the assessment. The ICU doctors have relatively limited awareness of VTE. Thus, there is an urgent need to update and standardize the ICU VTE guidelines for the prevention and treatment of VTE in China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Intensive Care Units. Survey of VTE knowledge and awareness was evaluated on VTE risk assessment rates at the time of admission and changed disease condition. A cross-sectional survey of ICU doctors in Zhejiang province found VTE risk assessment rates of 67.7% at admission and 60.4% upon changed disease condition, indicating limited awareness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: