Key result
Discontinuing hormone replacement therapy after MI shows no benefit for reinfarction or mortality.
Why the study?
The cardiovascular risk associated with discontinuing hormone replacement therapy after myocardial infarction was uncertain.
Does discontinuation of hormone replacement therapy reduce adverse cardiovascular events in women who survived a myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=3,322)
Yes
Does discontinuation of hormone replacement therapy reduce adverse cardiovascular events in women who survived a myocardial infarction?
Hazard Ratio: 0.9 (95% CI 0.68–1.19)
Discontinuation of hormone replacement therapy after myocardial infarction does not clearly increase or decrease the short-term risk of adverse cardiovascular events, though discontinuing vaginal estrogen may lower reinfarction risk.
Discontinuing HRT post-MI shows no clear short-term risk difference versus continuation; leaves open whether to alter therapy in symptomatic women.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in women who discontinue hormone replacement therapy after myocardial infarction compared with those who continue. DESIGN: Nationwide register based cohort study. SETTING: All hospitals in Denmark. POPULATION: All 3322 women aged 40 years or over who survived 30 days after a myocardial infarction and were prescribed hormone replacement therapy at the time of myocardial infarction in the period 1997 to 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reinfarction, cardiovascular mortality, and all cause mortality 30 to 360 days after discharge.: RESULTS: A total of 282 (8.5%) women had a reinfarction, 218 (6.6%) died of cardiovascular causes, and 357 (10.7%) died of any cause during follow-up. Women who discontinued overall hormone replacement therapy in the first year after myocardial infarction did not have a significantly different risk of reinfarction (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.19), cardiovascular mortality (1.21, 0.90 to 1.62), or all cause mortality (1.22, 0.97 to 1.53) than women who continued use. However, discontinuation of vaginal oestrogen was associated with a lower risk of reinfarction (hazard ratio 0.54, 0.34 to 0.86). CONCLUSION: No certain conclusions can be drawn regarding increased or decreased risk of adverse cardiovascular events with continuing hormone replacement therapy after myocardial infarction. The results rule out neither a modest benefit nor a worrisome increase in risk. These figures may be valuable when a possible cardiovascular risk of hormone replacement therapy needs to be balanced with menopausal symptoms for the individual patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bretler et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction (n=3,322). Discontinuation of hormone replacement therapy vs. Continuation of hormone replacement therapy was evaluated on Reinfarction (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.68-1.19). Discontinuing hormone replacement therapy after myocardial infarction did not significantly alter the risk of reinfarction (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.68-1.19), cardiovascular, or all-cause mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: