Key result
Cyclophilin inhibitor resistance links to adaptive mutations in nonstructural proteins 2 and 5.
Why the study?
No approved treatments exist for nidovirus infections, and the mechanism by which cyclophilin inhibitors suppress nidovirus replication was unclear.
Resistance to cyclophilin inhibitors in equine arteritis virus is mediated by adaptive mutations in nonstructural proteins 2 and 5, providing insight into the mechanism of action for pan-nidovirus inhibitors.
May limit cyclophilin inhibitor efficacy in equines; leaves open relevance to related human viruses.
Currently, no approved treatments are available to combat infections with nidoviruses, a group of positive-stranded RNA viruses, including important zoonotic and veterinary pathogens. Previously, the cyclophilin inhibitors cyclosporine (CsA) and alisporivir (ALV) were shown to inhibit the replication of diverse nidoviruses (both arteriviruses and coronaviruses), and they may thus represent a class of pan-nidovirus inhibitors. In this study, using the arterivirus prototype equine arteritis virus, we have established that resistance to CsA and ALV treatment is associated with adaptive mutations in two transmembrane subunits of the viral replication machinery, nonstructural proteins 2 and 5. This is the first evidence for the involvement of specific replicase subunits of arteriviruses in the mechanism underlying the inhibition of their replication by cyclophilin inhibitors. Understanding this mechanism of action is of major importance to guide future drug design, both for nidoviruses and for other RNA viruses inhibited by these compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilde et al. (2019) studied Equine arteritis virus infection. Cyclophilin inhibitors (cyclosporine and alisporivir) was evaluated on Viral resistance mechanisms. Resistance to cyclosporine and alisporivir in equine arteritis virus is associated with adaptive mutations in nonstructural proteins 2 and 5 of the viral replication machinery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: