Key result
Goal-directed fluid therapy in cardiac surgery shows trends toward shorter hospital and ICU stays.
Why the study?
There is debate on optimal fluid management approaches, hemodynamic parameters, and fluid types in cardiac surgery, with fewer studies compared to non-cardiac surgery.
What are the current fluid management practices and the effects of goal-directed therapy in cardiac surgery?
What are the current fluid management practices and the effects of goal-directed therapy in cardiac surgery?
This integrative review highlights that while crystalloids and standard hemodynamic monitoring are common in cardiac surgery, goal-directed therapy may slightly increase fluid administration but decrease hospital and ICU length of stay.
Should not yet change fluid management in cardiac surgery; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm shorter stays.
Adequate fluid administration during and after cardiac surgery is essential to ensure adequate oxygen delivery to the tissues, while simultaneously avoiding the dangers of hypervolemia and fluid overload. In both cardiac and non-cardiac surgery there has been debate on what the best approach to fluid management is, what hemodynamic parameters should be used to assess fluid requirements, and what type of fluids should be used. There are several studies in non-cardiac surgery that examine these issues, while they are fewer in the field of cardiac surgery. An integrative review design was used to examine the current evidence on fluid management practices in cardiac surgery. Thirteen studies were included in this review. They included four studies of surveys on fluid management practices, eight studies that utilized goal directed therapy (GDT), and one observational study on fluid administration practices in cardiac surgical patients. The results showed that arterial blood pressure (ABP), central venous pressure (CVP), and echocardiography were used most often to monitor volume status. Crystalloids were used most frequently for volume replacement. In the studies utilizing GDT, fluid administration was often based on stroke volume variation (SVV) and cardiac index (CI) goals. A slight trend towards increased fluid administration was seen in the GDT groups. Fluid bolus volumes ranged from 100 to 500 ml. The GDT groups had a slight trend toward decreased length of both hospital and ICU stay. An important limitation of the review was that none of the studies were conducted in the United States of America.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beena George (2018) conducted a review in Cardiac surgery (n=13). Goal-directed therapy (GDT) and fluid management was evaluated. Goal-directed therapy for fluid management in cardiac surgery showed a slight trend toward increased fluid administration and decreased length of hospital and ICU stay.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: