Key result
Peroperative inotrope use varies up to ~8-fold across physicians during cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
There are no well-established evidence-based clinical guidelines on the most appropriate use of peroperative inotropic support in cardiac surgery.
Population
3585 consecutive cardiac surgery cases from three university hospitals in Western Denmark
Comparison
Use versus non-use of peroperative inotropic support at separation from cardiopulmonary bypass
Design
Population-based observational study using registry data
Authors
Loading...
Marked interphysician variation in peroperative inotrope use persists; leaves open whether standardization improves outcomes.
Observational (n=3,585)
Yes
Effect estimate: OR 0.3 to 2.3 (95% CI 0.15-0.61 to 1.83-2.71)
There is substantial physician-level variation in the use of peroperative inotropic support during cardiac surgery, independent of patient and procedural risk factors, highlighting the need for evidence-based guidelines.
Nielsen et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Cardiac surgery (n=3,585). Peroperative inotropic support vs. Rest of physicians was evaluated on Use of high-dose inotropic support (OR 0.3 to 2.3, 95% CI 0.15-0.61 to 1.83-2.71). The use of peroperative inotropic support during cardiac surgery varied significantly among physicians, with adjusted odds ratios ranging from 0.3 (95% CI 0.15-0.61) to 2.3 (95% CI 1.83-2.71).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: