Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Grading upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC) in cell blocks with small distorted tissue fragments can be challenging; interobserver agreement is poor among pathologists. Mitotic figure (MF) counting along with nuclear features is important in grading these tumors. We evaluated the use of the mitotic-specific marker phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) as an adjunct to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain for grading UTUC in cell blocks. METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from the cell blocks of 61 UTUC were stained with H&E and PHH3 antibody. The grading of tumors was performed independently by 3 pathologists, on both H&E-stained and PHH3 plus H&E-stained slides. The grading system used was the 1973 WHO 3-point grading system. Gradings were compared by all the pathologists for H&E staining versus PHH3 plus H&E staining with the Stuart-Maxwell test of marginal homogeneity that accounts for the matched data. RESULTS: The average pairwise agreement by H&E alone was 55%, and 80% by PHH3 plus H&E. CONCLUSION: By adding PHH3 immunostain to the H&E, the agreement in grading the carcinomas among the 3 pathologists improved dramatically. PHH3 immunostain may play an important role in grading UTUC in small cell block samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solomides et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: