Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Hallux valgus (HV) is the most common forefoot deformity, and is known to be a debilitating disease, causing pain and reduced social function. There are various established surgical treatments for HV, with patient satisfaction up to 85% after surgery. In this paper, we aim to identify the pre-operative factors that may serve as predictors to patient outcome after surgery, to help surgeons select suitable candidates for surgery in the clinic. Methods: A prospective study was done on patients who underwent scarf and akin osteotomy for symptomatic HV between October 2015 and March 2018. Five patient factors were collected pre-operatively, including osteoarthritis grade of first metatarsophalangeal joint, severity of HV, presence of osteoarthritic or sesamoid pain, and presence of flat foot. Patient’s self-reported outcomes was assessed pre- and post-surgery, using the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and Visual Analogue Score (VAS). Pre- and post-surgery outcome scores were compared, and changes in scores analysed with numerous patient factors to identify any significant association. Results: 41 feet of 36 patients were included after implementation of exclusion criteria. Both MOXFQ and VAS showed a significant reduction in scores (improvement in outcomes) after surgery. None of the pre-operative patient factors examined was found to be significantly associated with the reduction in MOXFQ score. However, the results suggested that high pre-surgery MOXFQ score was associated with a greater MOXFQ score reduction post-surgery, with p-value of <0.001. Conclusion: Our study found that none of the factors looked at significantly correlated with reductions in MOXFQ and VAS scores post-surgery, other than high presurgery MOXFQ scores. This suggests that surgeons should counsel as such in clinic. Nonetheless, as this study had a small study size, further studies should be done to support the findings of this research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: