Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A series of first-principles electronic structure calculations have been performed to determine the most stable structures of F - (H 2 O) n clusters ( n = 4, 8, 12, and 16) and the hydration free energy of fluoride anion (F - ). The calculated results show that a new, tetrahedrally coordinated fluoride anion hydration structure F - (H 2 O) 4 cluster is lower in Gibbs free energy than the previously considered most stable structure of F - (H 2 O) 4 . The first ab initio prediction of potential stable hydration structures for F - (H 2 O) n clusters ( n = 8, 12, and 16) are given. The energetic results show that the tetrahedrally coordinated fluoride anion hydration structure becomes more stable as compared to the other hydration structures with a pyramidal coordination, i.e., a surface ion cluster state, as the cluster size increases from n = 8 to n = 12 to n = 16. This suggests that, with increasing n, the fluoride anion will be internally solvated in large enough F - (H 2 O) n clusters. These results provide insight into the transition from the hydration structure found in small gas-phase hydrated-anion clusters to the hydration structure observed in aqueous solution. The calculated results show that, for a given n, the bulk solvent effects can qualitatively change the relative thermodynamic stability of different possible isomers of F - (H 2 O) n clusters and the most stable structure in solution is not necessarily the most stable structure in the gas phase. When n = 16, a pyramidally coordinated fluoride anion hydration structure is the most stable structure in the gas phase, whereas a tetrahedrally coordinated fluoride anion hydration structure has the lowest free energy in solution. The absolute hydration free energy of fluoride anion in aqueous solution, Δ G hyd 298 (F - ), is predicted to be −104.3 ± 0.7 kcal/mol by using a reliable computational protocol of first-principles solvation-included electronic structure calculations. The predicted Δ G hyd 298 (F - ) value of −104.3 ± 0.7 kcal/mol, together with our previously calculated Δ G hyd 298 (H + ) value of −262.4 kcal/mol determined by using the same computational protocol, gives Δ G hyd 298 (F - ) + Δ G hyd 298 (H + ) = −366.7 ± 0.7 kcal/mol in excellent agreement with the value of −366.5 kcal/mol derived from the available experimental data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhan et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: