Key result
Off-hours pVAD implantation is linked to a ~16% absolute increase in access-site complications.
Why the study?
The relationship between percutaneous left ventricular assist device implantation time and access-site complication rates in cardiogenic shock patients was unclear.
Does pVAD insertion during off-hours increase access-site complications compared to on-hours in patients with cardiogenic shock?
Observational (n=224)
No
Does pVAD insertion during off-hours increase access-site complications compared to on-hours in patients with cardiogenic shock?
Absolute Event Rate: 26% vs 10%
p-value: p=0.002
pVAD implantation during off-hours for cardiogenic shock is associated with significantly higher rates of access-site complications and premature device discontinuation compared to on-hours implantation.
Off-hours pVAD insertion was associated with higher access-site complications; leaves open whether staffing or timing optimization reduces risk in cardiogenic shock.
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pVADs) may be used in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) to stabilize hemodynamics and maintain sufficient end-organ perfusion. Vascular complications are commonly observed in patients with pVAD support. We aimed to assess the relationship between pVAD implantation time and access-site complication rates. This retrospective observational study included all patients who underwent pVAD insertion for the treatment of CS at our university hospital between 2014 and 2021 (n = 224). Depending on the pVAD insertion time, the patients were assigned to the on-hours (n = 120) or off-hours group (n = 104). Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics and comorbidities. The rate of access-site-related complications was higher in the off-hours group than in the on-hours group (26% vs. 10%, p = 0.002). Premature discontinuation of pVAD support to prevent limb ischemia or manage access-site bleeding was required more often in the off-hours group than in the on-hours group (14% vs. 5%, p = 0.016). Pre-existing peripheral artery disease and implantation time off-hours were independent predictors for access-siterelated vascular complications. In conclusion, patients with CS in whom pVAD was inserted during off-hours had higher rates of access-site-related complications and premature discontinuation of pVAD support than those in whom pVAD was inserted during on-hours.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haschemi et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Cardiogenic shock (n=224). pVAD implantation during off-hours vs. pVAD implantation during on-hours was evaluated on Access-site-related complications (p=0.002). Percutaneous left ventricular assist device implantation during off-hours was associated with a higher rate of access-site-related complications compared to on-hours (26% vs. 10%, p=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: