Why the study?
The study aimed to determine whether fragmented QRS and QRS distortion on admission ECG can predict thrombolytic therapy success and infarct-related artery patency in STEMI patients.
Does the presence of fQRS on admission ECG predict reperfusion success and infarct-related artery patency in STEMI patients undergoing thrombolytic therapy?
Observational (n=203)
Does the presence of fQRS on admission ECG predict reperfusion success and infarct-related artery patency in STEMI patients undergoing thrombolytic therapy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The presence of fragmented QRS on admission ECG in STEMI patients is a simple marker that strongly predicts thrombolytic failure, suggesting these patients may benefit from being directed to primary percutaneous coronary intervention without delay.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine whether the presence of fragmented QRS (fQRS) and QRS distortion on admission ECG can be used to predict the success of treatment before beginning thrombolytic therapy (TT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and three eligible patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction who received TT consecutively between 1 January 2009 and 1 July 2013 were enrolled. The presence of fQRS and QRS distortion was analyzed at admission ECG. The electrocardiographic criteria of reperfusion were defined as 50% or more of ST resolution (STR), whereas the angiographic criteria of reperfusion were defined as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 2/3 flow in the infarct-related artery. RESULTS: fQRS was detected in 63 (31%) patients. Compared with patients with non-fQRS, STR was lower (46.1±17.7 vs. 73.6±20.9, respectively; P<0.001), thrombolysis failure was higher (44.4 vs. 9.3%, respectively; P<0.001), and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 0/1 flow was more common (39.7 vs. 10.7%, respectively; P<0.001) in patients with fQRS. Higher numbers of fQRS derivations were significantly related to low percentages of STR (r=-0.615, P<0.001). In predicting occluded infarct-related artery, we found no difference between the negative predictive values of fQRS and inadequate STR after TT (89.3 vs. 95.1%; P>0.05). However, there was no relationship between QRS distortion and failed thrombolysis. CONCLUSION: fQRS was detected in just 31% of the patients, but we found that it can be used to predict thrombolytic failure. Patients who have this simple marker on admission ECG may be directed to percutaneous interventions as a first-line therapy without any delay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dursun et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (n=203). Fragmented QRS (fQRS) on admission ECG vs. Absence of fQRS (non-fQRS) was evaluated on Thrombolysis failure (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: