Key result
Pharmacological sleep interventions in athletes carry risks of dependency and potential performance impacts, highlighting the need to prioritize non-pharmacological strategies.
This commentary highlights key considerations in the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies to optimize sleep and recovery in athletes.
Urges caution with pharmacological sleep aids in athletes; leaves open optimal protocols pending prospective trials.
The necessity of sufficient sleep for health and sustained high performance in athletes is increasingly recognised. There are frequently scenarios where an athlete’s opportunity for sleep (eg, travelling East across several time zones, sports fixture congestion) and propensity for sleep (eg, overarousal, anxiety, insomnia, circadian rhythm shifts) may compromise sleep quality and/or quantity.1 For example, transitioning from a highly stimulating night game (often purposefully accentuated with caffeine) to entering a full night of good quality sleep can be highly problematic for athletes, resulting in insomnia. The demand for quick, effective recovery including restful sleep prior to the next training session or game, is top-of-mind for athletes and leads their desire to optimise the time available for recovery. At these times, using a pharmacological intervention can provide a potential solution, however, the risks should also be considered against the benefits. For example, the potential impact on performance, and the risk of an athlete forming a habit. on sleep medications in sports medicine is limited,2 and the use of sleep agents was not covered by a recent sleep consensus paper.1 The purpose of this commentary is to highlight key considerations in the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies to optimise sleep in athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedlar et al. (2023) conducted an editorial in Sleep disturbances in athletes. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological sleep interventions was evaluated. Pharmacological sleep interventions in athletes carry risks of dependency and potential performance impacts, highlighting the need to prioritize non-pharmacological strategies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: