Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the cost considerations and strategies for incorporating ultrasound (US) in a head and neck practice. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective chart review of office-based US procedures from 2001 to 2005 was completed at our academic medical center. Billing and coding for US and US guided fine needle aspiration (USFNA) were examined. RESULTS: The appropriate CPT codes are 76536 for US and 76942 and 10022 for USFNA-related procedures. The USFNA codes should be used repeatedly for correct coding of biopsies from multiple sites. Cost (equipment) sharing between specialties is a potential strategy for office-based US incorporation. CONCLUSION: Based on practice volume, specific CPT coding, and Medicare reimbursements, office-based US equipment and certification costs could be offset in 1 year. SIGNIFICANCE: Office-based US can be readily incorporated with significant benefits to patients. Billing and usage strategies were identified that would improve the economics of providing office-based US.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akbar et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: