Key result
VQE scaled scores fail to predict first-attempt pass rates on the Vascular Certifying Examination.
Why the study?
Identification of vascular surgery trainees at risk of board certification failure is important for both graduates and their training programs to maintain accreditation.
Cohort (n=579)
Yes
Odds Ratio: 1 (95% CI 1–1.01)
p-value: p=0.077
Performance on the Vascular Qualifying Examination does not predict first-time pass achievement on the Vascular Certifying Examination among vascular surgery trainees.
VQE scores should not guide VCE expectations; leaves open identification of other predictors for vascular surgery certification.
Background Specialty board certification is an important indicator of surgeon competence and necessary for residency and fellowship programs to maintain accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Thus, identification of trainees at risk of board certification failure is important for both vascular surgery graduates and their parent program. We sought to examine the correlation of Vascular Qualifying Examination (VQE) performance on first-time pass achievement of the Vascular Certifying Examination (VCE). Methods We used American Board of Surgery data to examine predictive associations of a national longitudinal cohort of all vascular surgery integrated residents (VIRs) and vascular surgery fellows (VSFs) who completed the VQE and VCE from 2016 through 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to examine trends. We used χ 2 tests to examine proportional group differences. Predictive associations between VQE scaled score performance and first-time pass achievement on subsequent VCE attempts were examined using logistic regression. Results VQE scaled score performance and VCE pass rates were obtained for all VIRs and VSFs (n = 579; 175 residents and 404 fellows) from 151 programs (48 residency and 103 fellowship) during the study period. First-attempt pass rate for the VQE was 96% in the study cohort, and first-attempt pass rate for the VCE was 94%. There were no significant differences in pass-fail rates in VQE and VCE for VIR and VSF candidates ( P = .210 and P = .116, respectively). Trainee scaled score performance on the VQE was not predictive of subsequent first-attempt pass achievement on VCE (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01; P = .077). Stratified subgroup analyses by VIR and VSF cohorts also showed no significant predictive first-attempt VCE pass achievement ( P = .190 and P = .094, respectively). Conclusions In this national cohort of vascular trainees taking the VQE and VCE, VQE performance was not predictive of subsequent VCE first-time pass achievement. This finding highlights the necessity to identify other measures of trainee competence to indicate the preparedness of trainees for board certification examinations. Furthermore, this may be reflective of the ability to assess distinctive competencies between the two examinations, with the VQE focused on medical knowledge and the VCE on clinical judgment and interpersonal communication skills, thus broadening assessment of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies to ensure certification of vascular surgeons possessing both the knowledge and judgment necessary to maintain high-quality standards within our specialty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weaver et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Vascular surgery board certification (n=579). Vascular Qualifying Examination (VQE) scaled score performance was evaluated on First-time pass achievement on the Vascular Certifying Examination (VCE) (OR 1.00, 95% CI 1.00-1.01, p=0.077). Vascular Qualifying Examination scaled score performance was not predictive of subsequent first-attempt pass achievement on the Vascular Certifying Examination (OR 1.00; 95% CI 1.00-1.01; P=0.077).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: