Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The author has limited his discussion on the nasal accessory sinuses to anatomic and clinical aspects. In the portion devoted to anatomic considerations he has done unusually well, and any one from medical student to experienced rhinologist can derive much of value from a careful study of this part of the text. It is based on the author's own extensive dissections over a period of ten years. The illustrations are numerous and well done, and because they are original they have a freshness and absence of the familiar which makes their study a combined pleasure and benefit. The diagnostic and therapeutic considerations are abbreviated but not lacking in valuable content. It is apparent that they represent the mature judgment of a clinician of conservative tendencies whose opinions have been influenced not only by well grounded anatomic knowledge but by a sympathetic understanding of the healthy physiologic advances that have taken
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1942 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: