Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Autologous breast reconstruction is an integral component of post-mastectomy care. Despite the advantages of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, fat necrosis remains a common complication that compromises aesthetic outcomes, patient satisfaction, and reconstructive durability. This systematic review evaluates risk factors associated with fat necrosis following DIEP flap breast reconstruction to inform clinical decision-making and optimize outcomes. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. English-language studies between 2008 and 2025 evaluating risk factors or predictive models for fat necrosis following DIEP flap breast reconstruction were included. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. Results Thirteen studies involving 3,609 flaps in 3,013 patients were analysed. . Fat necrosis incidence ranged from 7.5% to 59.5%. DIEP flaps were associated with higher rates of vascular compromise requiring reoperation (13% p=0.003). Use of lateral row perforators significantly reduced fat necrosis compared with medial row perforators (8.2% vs. 24.5%; p<0.001). Intraoperative indocyanine green angiography was associated with reduced fat necrosis (RR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25–0.97; p=0.021). Higher flap weight and body mass index greater than 30 kg/m² were consistent predictors. Total flap loss was rare (<1%). Conclusions Fat necrosis remains a predominant complication following DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Optimization of patient selection, perforator strategy, and intraoperative perfusion assessment may reduce ischemic morbidity and improve reconstructive outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chukwu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: