Key result
Painful mechanical impacts elicited somatosensory evoked magnetic field responses in bilateral secondary sensory cortical regions and the contralateral cingulate gyrus, unlike tactile stimulation.
Cross-Sectional (n=7)
Mechanical impact loading provides a useful method for the neurophysiologic evaluation of cortical pain perception using MEG.
Novel impact loading enables MEG differentiation of pain versus touch; leaves open clinical translation pending validation.
The purpose of this study was to investigate cortical processing of painful compared with tactile mechanical stimulation by means of magnetoencephalography (MEG) using the novel technique of mechanical impact loading. A light, hard projectile is accelerated pneumatically in a guiding barrel and elicits a brief sensation of pain when hitting the skin in free flight. Controllable noxious and innocuous impact velocities facilitate the generation of different, predetermined stimulus intensities. The authors applied painful as well as tactile mechanical impacts to the dorsum of the second, third, and fourth digit of the nondominant hand. Pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SSEFs) were compared with those following tactile stimulation in seven healthy volunteers. Contralateral primary sensory cortical area activation was observed within the first 70 msec after tactile as well as painful stimulus intensities. Only painful impacts elicited SSEF responses assigned to the bilateral secondary sensory cortical regions and to the middle part of the contralateral cingulate gyrus, which were active at latency ranges of 55 to 155 msec and 90 to 220 msec respectively. Additional long-latency responses occurred in these cortical areas as long as 280 msec after painful stimulation in three subjects. In contrast to tactile stimulation, painful mechanical impacts elicited SSEF responses in cortical areas demonstrated to be involved in central pain processing by previous MEG and neuroimaging studies. Because of its similarity to natural noxious stimuli and the possibility of adjustable painful and tactile impact velocities, the technique of mechanical impact loading provides a useful method for the neurophysiologic evaluation of cortical pain perception.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Druschky et al. (2000) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy volunteers (n=7). Painful mechanical impacts vs. Tactile mechanical impacts was evaluated on Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SSEFs) and cortical area activation. Painful mechanical impacts elicited somatosensory evoked magnetic field responses in bilateral secondary sensory cortical regions and the contralateral cingulate gyrus, unlike tactile stimulation.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: