Key result
Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) significantly improved overall functional outcomes, with 95% of patients achieving excellent or good results compared to 50% with Dynamic Hip Screw (p=0.018).
Why the study?
Does PFNA improve surgical and functional outcomes compared to DHS in patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures?
RCT (n=40)
Open-label
Sealed envelope method
No
Does PFNA improve surgical and functional outcomes compared to DHS in patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures?
Absolute Event Rate: 95% vs 50%
p-value: p=0.018
PFNA provides better surgical and functional outcomes than DHS for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
DHS versus PFNA outcomes in unstable intertrochanteric fractures leave open questions of superiority; randomized trials needed before practice change.
Introduction: Unstable intertrochanteric fracture is common fracture.Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is standard treatment method.Now newer methods such as Proximal Femoral Nailing Antirotation (PFNA) and other Proximal Femoral Nails having advantage of central device came.Present study was carried out to determine outcome of unstable intertrochanteric fractures with dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nailing antirotation (PFNA).Material and Methods: This comparative study was carried out on patients admitted in SMS Medical College and attached Hospitals Jaipur between June 2016 to July 2017.Total 40 patients having unstable intertrochanteric fractures were allocated randomly in two treatment groups.20 patients were treated by DHS and 20 patients were treated by PFNA.We looked for length of incision, duration of surgery, blood loss, fluoroscopy timing, union time, any complications and functional outcome.Result: The smaller incision, relatively less blood loss, shorter operative times, less limb shortening and a better overall functional outcome with the PFNA indicate that the PFNA has advantage over the DHS.There was no statistically difference between union time of fractures in both groups.Conclusion: PFNA has advantage over the DHS in fixation of unstable intertochanteric fractures in terms of smaller incision, relatively less blood loss, shorter operative time, less limb shortening and a better overall functional outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jangir et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Unstable intertrochanteric fractures of femur (n=40). Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) vs. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) was evaluated on Excellent or good functional outcome (Harris Hip Score) (p=0.018). Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) significantly improved overall functional outcomes, with 95% of patients achieving excellent or good results compared to 50% with Dynamic Hip Screw (p=0.018).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: