BACKGROUND: various modifications of the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) determination have been suggested since the original Westergren procedure that has been adopted as the gold standard by the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH). Recently, an automated method, (Alifax Test 1), based on a technique completely different from Westergren, has been introduced. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this comparative study, ESR of blood from 680 patients with various rheumatic diseases was determined on both Test 1 and the StaRRsed automated ESR analyser which performs measurements in accordance with ICSH specifications. Furthermore the robustness of the new technique was evaluated. RESULTS: Direct correlation of Test 1 and StaRRsed measurements confirmed the results of previous studies: an overall correlation coefficient of R = 0.90. However, further statistical analysis showed that, depending on the instrument that was used, in 78 samples (i.e. 11.5%) the results could lead to different treatment suggestions. Furthermore it appeared that several procedural factors could influence the final Test 1 outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its sensitivity for procedural variations, Test 1 measurements should be carried out under strictly standardized conditions. Especially at the higher ESR levels the Test 1 technique is, however, not a reliable alternative for the ICSH approved 'Westergren' method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hardeman et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: