Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: The present study was performed to determine the risk of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) within 2 years after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in patients with uterovaginal prolapse. Materials and Methods: A retrospective comparative study was performed in a population of 204 patients over a 2-year follow-up period following LSC with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy or uterine preservation at a single urological clinic between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome was surgical failure following LSC in cases of POP, focusing on failures occurring before the 2 nd year of follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratios (ORs) for surgical failure. Results: The primary outcome, surgical failure in cases of POP, occurred 2 years after the initial surgery in 19 of the 204 patients (9.3%) (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7% – 14.2%). Surgical failure was most common in the anterior compartment ( n = 10, 4.9%), and further surgery was performed in seven of the patients with surgical failure (3.4%). The poor primary outcome was predicted by lysis of adhesions (OR, 7.5, 95% CI, 1.6–33.8, P = 0.008) and preoperative POP stage IV (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.1–10.8, P = 0.03) on multivariable logistic regression analysis. Conclusion: The overall rate of surgical failure following LSC in our cohort was 9.3% over the 2-year follow-up period after surgery, and preoperative prolapse stage IV was associated with a higher risk of recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sato et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: