Key result
The interval taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test (ITKDtest) demonstrated excellent reliability for V̇o2peak (α = 0.902) and is valid for measuring cardiorespiratory variables.
Why the study?
The validity of an interval taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test compared with running and continuous taekwondo-specific tests was not established.
Does an interval taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test validly measure cardiorespiratory variables compared to running CPET and continuous taekwondo-specific CPET in athletes?
Cross-Sectional (n=15)
Counterbalanced order
Does an interval taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test validly measure cardiorespiratory variables compared to running CPET and continuous taekwondo-specific CPET in athletes?
p-value: p=0.03
The ITKDtest is a valid tool for measuring cardiorespiratory variables for exercise prescription in taekwondo athletes, though the continuous test may be better for assessing VTs.
Araujo, MP, Soares, PP, Hausen, MR, Julio, HS, Porto, F, and Gurgel, JL. Validity of an interval taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test. J Strength Cond Res 35(7): 1956-1963, 2021-The objective of this study is to propose and validate an interval taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test (ITKDtest) and compare it with running cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and a continuous taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test (CTKDtest). Fifteen athletes (age 22 ± 4 years; body mass 71.1 ± 10.2 kg; height 178.14 ± 8.3 cm; and body mass index 22.4 ± 2.4 kg·m-2) performed CPET, CTKDtest, and ITKDtest on a counterbalanced order. Oxygen uptake (V̇o2), heart rate (HR), and ventilatory thresholds (VTs 1 and 2) were measured during the 3 tests. ITKDtest started at 30 kicks per minute and increased 10 kicks each 2 minutes, with a period of passive recovery, lasting 1 minute. Interval protocol design simulated the temporal structure of an official taekwondo fight. Significant difference between specific tests was found for V̇o2 VT1 (p = 0.03), V̇o2 VT1 (%V̇o2peak) (p = 0.009), V̇o2 VT2 (p = 0.005), and V̇o2 VT2 (%V̇o2peak) (p = 0.013). Reliability was considered "excellent" for V̇o2peak (α = 0.902; SEM = 0.179), "good" for V̇o2 VT1 (α = 0.708; SEM = 3.823) and HRpeak (α = 0.803; SEM = 2.987), and "fair" for V̇o2 VT2 (α = 0.659; SEM = 4.498) and HR VT2 (α = 0.580; SEM = 8.868). Bland-Altman analyses reported a mean difference of 2.9 ± 6.6 ml·kg-1·min-1 (CPET-ITKDtest) and 1.4 ± 6.1 ml·kg-1·min-1 (CTKDtest-ITKDtest). ITKDtest may be used for measurement of cardiorespiratory variables commonly used in exercise prescription, whereas CTKDtest seems to be a more appropriate method to assess V̇o2 and HR at VTs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Araújo et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Taekwondo athletes (n=15). Interval taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test (ITKDtest) vs. Running cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and continuous taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test (CTKDtest) was evaluated on Oxygen uptake (V̇o2) at ventilatory threshold 1 (VT1) (p=0.03). The interval taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test (ITKDtest) demonstrated excellent reliability for V̇o2peak (α = 0.902) and is valid for measuring cardiorespiratory variables.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: