Key result
LMA-classic and LMA-ProSeal insertion resulted in similar intraocular pressure profiles, with no significant difference between the devices up to 5 minutes post-insertion (p>0.05).
Why the study?
Does LMA-ProSeal compared to LMA-classic affect intraocular pressure in adult patients requiring general anaesthesia?
RCT (n=100)
Does LMA-ProSeal compared to LMA-classic affect intraocular pressure in adult patients requiring general anaesthesia?
p-value: p=>0.05
Both LMA-classic and LMA-ProSeal maintain intraocular pressure below baseline with similar profiles during insertion.
LMA-classic vs ProSeal effects on IOP remain inconclusive; leaves open optimal airway selection in ophthalmic anesthesia.
Background: One of the primary aims of anaesthetic management during ophthalmic surgery is to provide optimal control of intraocular pressure (IOP). Laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-classic and LMA-ProSeal have been compared on many aspects but we could not locate any trials comparing the effect of their insertion on IOP. Present study compared effect of LMA-classic and LMA-ProSeal insertion on the IOP. Methods: 100 patients requiring general anaesthesia for elective surgical procedures were divided into two groups (LMA-classic in 50 patients and LMA-ProSeal in 50 patients). Baseline IOP was recorded and after induction, LMA insertion was performed. Anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide and halothane in oxygen. IOP was measured just before LMA insertion, just after LMA insertion and thereafter at intervals of 1, 3 and 5 minutes. Results: IOP decreased in both groups after induction with propofol (p value> 0.05). It rose just after the insertion of airway device in both the groups (p value>0.05). At one minute after the device insertion IOP started decreasing (p value>0.05). At 3 minutes and 5 minutes after the insertion of airway device the IOP was still decreasing in both the groups and was not significantly different. Conclusion: Results of the present study show that IOP always remains below baseline with the use of LMA-classic as well as LMA-ProSeal. The study showed similar profile of two devices as far as IOP is concerned.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2012 study conducted an RCT in Elective surgical procedures requiring general anaesthesia (n=100). LMA-classic vs. LMA-ProSeal was evaluated on Intraocular pressure (IOP) (p=>0.05). LMA-classic and LMA-ProSeal insertion resulted in similar intraocular pressure profiles, with no significant difference between the devices up to 5 minutes post-insertion (p>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: