Key result
Concomitant cancer in AMI is linked to ~93% higher 3-year cardiovascular mortality.
Why the study?
The effect of coexisting cancer on treatment and clinical outcomes among acute myocardial infarction patients has not been systematically investigated.
Does a concomitant cancer diagnosis increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=6,607)
Does a concomitant cancer diagnosis increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
AMI patients with a concomitant cancer diagnosis are treated more conservatively and have a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular death and ischemic events compared to those without cancer.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights need for vigilant follow-up in AMI patients with cancer; leaves open optimal therapeutic strategies.
Background and Aims With the increasing coexistence of cardiovascular disease and cancer in contemporary clinical practice, studies on the outcomes in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with cancer has not been systematically investigated. This study sought to investigated the effect of coexisting cancer on the treatment and clinical outcomes among AMI patients. Methods We retrospectively integrated and analyzed cardiovascular data of 6,607 AMI patients between June 2016 and December 2019. Patients with cancer were compared with pair-matched cancer-naive patients. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to compare the differences in outcomes. Results Of 6,607 patients, 2.3% (n = 150) had been diagnosed with cancer. Patients with cancer were older (70.3 ± 10.0 vs. 63.9 ± 11.5 years, P < 0.001) and had a higher burden of comorbidities. Moreover, patients with cancer tended to receive clopidogrel (52.0 vs. 40.0%, P = 0.004) rather than ticagrelor (45.6 vs. 58.2%, P = 0.003) than those without cancer. After pairwise matching, patients with cancer were less likely to undergo in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention (61.3 vs. 70.0%, P = 0.055). And after 3-year follow-up, the cumulative incidence of cardiovascular death (14.0 vs. 8.3%; adjusted HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.11–3.39; P = 0.021) among patients with cancer was significantly higher than that among the matched controls, a similar pattern was observed for the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke (16.0 vs. 10.3%; adjusted HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.21–3.26; P = 0.007). Moreover, patients with a historical cancer diagnosis within 5 years had a higher risk of cardiovascular ischemic events. Conclusions AMI patients with a concomitant diagnosis of cancer tended to be treated with conservative therapies and were at substantially higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=6,607). Concomitant cancer diagnosis vs. Cancer-naive patients (matched controls) was evaluated on Cardiovascular death (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.11-3.39, p=0.021). A concomitant cancer diagnosis in AMI patients was associated with a higher 3-year incidence of cardiovascular death compared to matched controls (14.0% vs 8.3%; HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.11-3.39; P=0.021).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: