Key result
Ischemic zone LV apical pacing lowers LVEF by ~4% vs nonischemic lateral wall pacing.
Why the study?
The effects of left ventricular apical or lateral wall pacing on LV function during acute myocardial infarction were not well characterized.
Does pacing within the ischemic area decrease left ventricular ejection fraction during experimental acute myocardial infarction?
Does pacing within the ischemic area decrease left ventricular ejection fraction during experimental acute myocardial infarction?
In an experimental model of acute myocardial infarction, pacing within the ischemic zone significantly impairs left ventricular ejection fraction compared to pacing in a nonischemic area.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pacing the ischemic apex may worsen post-MI EF versus nonischemic lateral wall in pigs; leaves open optimal LV pacing site selection in acute infarction.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the effects on left ventricular (LV) function of LV apical or/and lateral wall pacing during an experimental acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: In 12 anesthetized pigs, epicardial LV pacing at the apex or lateral wall, or at both sites simultaneously, was performed before and after left anterior descending (LAD) ligation. Data concerning LV function were obtained by two-dimensional echo during spontaneous sinus rhythm (SR) and during pacing before and 15, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after LAD ligation. RESULTS: Before ligation of the LAD, pacing at the lateral wall (48.04 ± 6.25%) or both sites (45.71 ± 6.31%) reduced the LV ejection fraction (EF) significantly (P < 0.01) in comparison to SR (55.44 ± 4.10%). However, during pacing at the apex (50.19 ± 6.50%), the reduction was not significant. After LAD ligation, the EF during lateral pacing (43.02 ± 7.71%) was significantly higher than during apical pacing (38.78 ± 8.26%, P < 0.04) but was not significantly different from that during dual-site pacing (41.65 ± 8.69%). CONCLUSIONS: Pacing within the ischemic LV apical zone after LAD ligation impairs left ventricular ejection fraction, as compared with pacing the nonischemic LV lateral wall, and should therefore be avoided in clinical settings where the LV pacing site may be chosen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toumanidis et al. (2010) studied Experimental acute myocardial infarction (n=12). LV apical pacing (ischemic zone) vs. LV lateral wall pacing (nonischemic zone) was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (p=< 0.04). Pacing within the ischemic LV apical zone after LAD ligation significantly impaired left ventricular ejection fraction compared with pacing the nonischemic lateral wall (38.78% vs 43.02%, P<0.04).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: