Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I/II study evaluating nivolumab plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (N-AVD) as frontline therapy for treatment-naïve older adults (OA) with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03033914). METHODS: Patients age ≥60 years with newly diagnosed, any stage, cHL were treated with six cycles of AVD at standard doses plus nivolumab 240 mg intravenously once every 2 weeks (on days 1 and 15) of each cycle. A geriatric assessment was performed before therapy initiation. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Patient characteristics (N = 40) included median age of 66 years (range, 60-78 years) with 38% ≥70 years, 78% with stage III/IV disease, 68% with International Prognostic Score of ≥3, 82% dependent in ≥1 activities of daily living, 23% dependent in ≥1 instrumental activities of daily living, 50% with impaired timed up and go test, and 40% with polypharmacy. Among 37 response-evaluable patients, the median follow-up was 49 months and 3-year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 79% and 97%, respectively. Overall, 50% patients experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), including febrile neutropenia in 8%. Four (10%) patients stopped therapy due to TRAEs. There was no correlation between baseline geriatric impairments and survival outcomes or toxicities. Positron emission tomography-2 was not predictive of PFS or OS. CONCLUSION: N-AVD is a highly effective and well-tolerated frontline regimen in OA with cHL across a wide range of geriatric impairments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torka et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: