Key result
Pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics are linked to a threefold increase in high-quality documentation vs physician-led care.
Why the study?
High-quality documentation is critical for safe patient care, but differences in documentation quality between pharmacist-led and physician-led anticoagulation clinics were unclear.
Does a pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinic improve the quality of medical documentation compared to a physician-led clinic in patients receiving anticoagulation?
Cross-Sectional (n=331)
Does a pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinic improve the quality of medical documentation compared to a physician-led clinic in patients receiving anticoagulation?
Pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics demonstrated significantly higher quality and comprehensiveness of medical documentation compared to physician-led clinics.
Pharmacists documented anticoagulation notes more comprehensively than physicians; supports hypothesis-generating comparisons but should not yet change practice.
Background and objectives: High-quality documentation is critical in medical settings for providing safe patient care. This study was done with the objective of assessing the standard of medical records in anticoagulation clinics and investigating the distinctions between notes written by pharmacists and physicians. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of data from electronic health records (EHRs) was performed on patients who received anticoagulation and were observed at anticoagulation clinics from October to December 2020. Patients were monitored in two anticoagulation clinics, one administered by pharmacists and the other by physicians. The quality of the documentation was assessed using a score, and the note was assigned one of five categories according to its score: very good, good, average, poor, and very poor. The data was analyzed using Stata/SE 13.1. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant in all analytical tests. Results: A total of 331 patients were included. While 160 patients (48.3%) were followed by the physician-led clinic, 171 (51.6%) were by the pharmacist-led clinic. The average age of the patients was 54±15. 60.73% of them were female, and 90.3% of them were Saudi nationals. Warfarin was the most widely used anticoagulant (70%), followed by rivaroxaban (15.7%). Compared to physicians, pharmacists demonstrated very strong documentation (54% vs. 18%). The examination of the variables considered in the study revealed that physicians had significantly less drug-drug interaction documentation (17 vs. 71 times) or drug-food interaction documentation (23 vs. 71 times) than pharmacists. In terms of follow-up frequency, pharmacists were found to adhere to the clinic protocol (150 times) more frequently than physicians (104 times). However, there was no significant difference in therapeutic plan documentation between the two groups. (p = 0.416). Conclusion: Pharmacists were more comprehensive in their documentation than physicians in anticoagulation clinics. Unified clinic documentation can ensure consistent documentation within EHRs across all disciplines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almuqbil et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Anticoagulation therapy (n=331). Pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinic vs. Physician-led anticoagulation clinic was evaluated on Very strong documentation. Pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics demonstrated very strong documentation more frequently than physician-led clinics (54% vs. 18%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: