Key result
ProTrieve sheath successfully captures embolized tumor thrombus during advanced renal cell carcinoma resection.
Why the study?
Temporary inferior vena cava filters have been used to prevent tumor thrombus embolization during large-vessel oncologic surgeries, but the ProTrieve system has not been well studied in this context.
Does prophylactic deployment of the ProTrieve sheath prevent tumor thrombus embolization in patients undergoing resection of advanced renal cell carcinoma with IVC invasion?
Case Report (n=2)
Does prophylactic deployment of the ProTrieve sheath prevent tumor thrombus embolization in patients undergoing resection of advanced renal cell carcinoma with IVC invasion?
Prophylactic deployment of the ProTrieve sheath during resection of advanced renal cell carcinoma with IVC invasion may offer an effective method for intraoperative embolic protection.
May support embolic protection during RCC thrombectomy; leaves open prospective validation before adoption.
Vascular invasion is a common feature of renal cell carcinoma and intraoperative tumor thrombus embolization during surgical resection, although rare, is a devastating complication. Temporary inferior vena cava filters have been used in certain cases to protect against thrombi during large-vessel oncologic surgeries; however, the ProTrieve system (Stryker-Inari Medical) has not been well studied in this context. We report two cases in which intraoperative deployment of the ProTrieve sheath effectively captured embolized tumor thrombus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Green et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Advanced renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (n=2). ProTrieve sheath was evaluated on Capture of embolized tumor thrombus and prevention of embolic events. Intraoperative deployment of the ProTrieve sheath effectively captured embolized tumor thrombus and prevented embolic events during resection of advanced renal cell carcinoma in two patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: