Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Current recommendations suggest that routine screening for hypoglycemia should be performed in all term newborns with a birth weight (BW) below the 10th percentile. The impact of updated growth curves on the incidence of hypoglycemia in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) newborns has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the occurrence and severity of hypoglycemia in term newborns with a BW between the 10th and fifth percentile, and below the fifth percentile, using recently updated growth curves. DESIGN: A one-year prospective cohort study. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were gestational age of 37 weeks or greater and BW below the 10th percentile. Neonatal hypoglycemia was defined as a blood glucose level of less than 2.6 mmol/L measured after 2 h of life. Blood glucose was measured routinely for all SGA infants during the first 36 h of life. RESULTS: A total of 187 SGA infants met the study criteria: 85 infants with a BW between the 10th and fifth percentile, and 102 infants with a BW below the fifth percentile. The characteristics of the study cohort were similar between BW groups. Twenty-six per cent of the infants screened had at least one episode of hypoglycemia: 22% of infants in the 10th to fifth percentile group and 28% in the less than fifth percentile group. Hypoglycemia was symptomatic in four infants, all of whom were below the fifth percentile for BW. The mean (± SD) lowest blood glucose level was 2.1±0.4 mmol/L (range 0.6 mmol/L to 2.5 mmol/L) in the 10th to fifth percentile group and 2.0±0.5 mmol/L (range 0.8 mmol/L to 2.5 mmol/L) in the less than fifth percentile group (P=0.05). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates a high incidence of hypoglycemia among SGA infants with a BW below the 10th percentile using updated growth curves. There was no difference in the incidence of hypoglycemia among SGA infants with a BW below the fifth percentile versus those with a BW between the 10th and fifth percentile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mejri et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: