This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the potential of the parameters of the treatment plan (collimator angle, beam filtering and modulation) to reduce fetal dose for a pregnant woman with a brain tumor undergoing external photon radiotherapy. METHODS: Dose measurements were performed with a TrueBeam STx 6 MV using a Farmer ionization chamber, water-equivalent slabs (out-of-field dose profiles), and the ATOM phantom with additional homemade bellies affixed to simulate the three pregnancy trimesters. Eight treatment plans were evaluated, including 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans with varying collimator angles, beam filtering, and beam modulations. RESULTS: Adjusting the beam collimator angle can reduce fetal exposure by a factor of 2. The collimator angle minimizing dose in the out-of-field region (in inline direction) is not always achieved by placing the distal jaw in the cranio-caudal axis of the patient, as suggested in the literature. Fetal doses for FFF plans are systematically about 40% lower than for FF plans. CONCLUSIONS: Although the lowest fetal dose was obtained with 3D-CRT, adjusting beam collimator angle and beam modulation in VMAT FFF plans with a Truebeam machine resulted in a comparable fetal dose and better dose distribution to the primary tumor. This study provides indications on how to improve the benefit-risk ratio between minimal fetal dose and optimal target dose delivery through treatment plan parameter adjustment and highlights the need to characterize the out-of-field dose of the machine used.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edouard et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: