Bacterial pyrophosphates or aminobisphosphonates induce cytokine secretion and expansion of freshly isolated (resting) human V 9V 2 T cells.The initial expansion of T cells strictly depends on co-stimulatory signals of accessory cells and IL-2.However, resting T cells produce cytokines after stimulation with pyrophosphates combined with TLR3 ligand poly(I:C) in the absence of accessory cells.We observed that aminobisphosphonate together with poly(I:C) stimulation did not induce cytokine secretion in resting T cells.Moreover, proliferation of T cells within PBMC was enhanced after stimulation with pyrophosphates and poly(I:C), but not after stimulation with aminobisphosphonates plus poly(I:C), even though accessory cells were present.Aminobisphosphonate together with poly(I:C) induced a delayed up-regulation of co-stimulatory molecules and cell survival of monocytes within PBMC.In contrast to resting T cells, activated V 9V 2 T cells produced IFN-after stimulation with pyrophosphate antigens as well as with aminobisphosphonate in the absence of accessory cells and poly(I:C).However, aminobisphosphonate stimulation resulted in much lower IFN-production than pyrophosphate stimulation, which fits well with the weaker aminobisphosphonate induced activation of extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) involved in IFN-secretion.Poly(I:C) failed to enhance cytokine production and proliferation of activated T cell lines after aminobisphosphonate stimulation unless accessory cells were added.Taken together, the results suggest a differential regulation of V 9V 2 T cell activation by pyrophosphates and aminobisphosphonates, especially after co-stimulation with poly(I:C).This might be relevant when using such pyrophosphates or aminobisphosphonates together with TLR3 agonists as adjuvants in T cell-based immunotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohnesorge et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: