Key result
Only ~26% of patients with affective disorders receive documented cardiovascular physical-health monitoring before specialist care.
Why the study?
Monitoring of physical health, including cardiovascular risk factors, in patients with affective (mood and anxiety) disorders is poorly understood despite known increased morbidity and mortality.
Observational (n=113)
Patients with affective disorders have poor rates of physical health monitoring for cardiovascular risk factors despite frequent healthcare contacts.
Physical health monitoring remains infrequent in affective disorder patients despite multiple service contacts; leaves open whether systematic protocols improve cardiometabolic outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Severe mental illness is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality, most commonly from cardiovascular disease. Much of the risk is explicable by potentially modifiable factors such as diabetes and dyslipidaemia, and regular screening of patients with severe mental illness is recommended. Screening and intervention for physical illness among people with schizophrenia is often suboptimal, but little is known about monitoring physical health in patients with affective (mood and anxiety) disorders. METHOD: Electronic and paper records were examined for evidence of monitoring of cardiovascular disease risk factors in the 12 months prior to assessment in patients attending a tertiary referral specialist service for affective disorders over a period of 39 months. The number of contacts with healthcare services was calculated for each patient to provide an estimate of the opportunities for monitoring. RESULTS: Notes for 113 patients were examined. The mean number of contacts with outpatient services in the 12 months before assessment was 6.9 (standard deviation 7.7). Documented evidence of physical-health monitoring was seen in only 29 patients: monitoring was more commonly undertaken in patients with recurrent unipolar depression and in those who had undergone recent inpatient treatment. Contacts that could have allowed monitoring of physical health were common. DISCUSSION: Although most patients had multiple contacts with health services in the 12-month period before their assessment in the service, there was little evidence of use of primary-prevention measures to reduce the risks of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in this vulnerable population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lack et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Affective (mood and anxiety) disorders (n=113). Healthcare service contacts was evaluated on Documented evidence of physical-health monitoring. Documented evidence of physical-health monitoring was found in only 25.7% (29 of 113) of patients with affective disorders in the 12 months prior to specialist assessment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: