Key result
A 10-week heart rate variability biofeedback intervention was deemed safe and feasible for adults with chronic spinal cord injury, with high adherence and retention, though recruitment and missing cerebral blood velocity data require protocol modifications for the full trial.
Why the study?
Is a 10-week heart rate variability biofeedback intervention feasible to evaluate in a randomized controlled trial for adults with chronic spinal cord injury?
RCT (n=10)
Single-blind (outcome assessors blinded)
Block randomization (1:1 allocation)
No
Is a 10-week heart rate variability biofeedback intervention feasible to evaluate in a randomized controlled trial for adults with chronic spinal cord injury?
A 10-week heart rate variability biofeedback intervention is feasible and safe for adults with chronic spinal cord injury, provided protocol modifications are made to address recruitment and data collection challenges.
BACKGROUND: Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV-F) is a neurocardiac self-regulation therapy, that has been shown to improve cardiac autonomic regulation, emotional regulation, and cognitive function in various clinical populations. Despite this, there is little evidence for the benefit of HRV-F in adults with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: This study evaluated the feasibility of conducting a parallel randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of a 10-week HRV-F intervention for adults with chronic SCI. Individuals with SCI (irrespective of level and completeness), at least 12 months after diagnosis due to any traumatic or non-traumatic and non-progressive cause, and aged between 18 and 70 years of age were eligible to participate. Feasibility was evaluated in terms of six primary outcomes: (i) randomisation and blinding, (ii) participant safety, (iii) recruitment, (iv) retention, (v) adherence to the intervention, and (vi) primary outcome data collection methods (heart rate variability [HRV] and cerebral blood velocity [CBv]). Participants' satisfaction, impression of change, and technological issues were assessed as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The first 10 participants of the RCT (n = 120) were studied in the 10-week feasibility study. No serious adverse events occurred during the study activities (assessment or intervention sessions). While there were no withdrawals and high adherence to the intervention, the recruitment rate was below the target. There were no missing HRV data; however, missing data for CBv was higher than anticipated based on the literature (35% vs. 20%). A few minor connectivity issues occurred with the technology used for home training by participants. Modifications to the RCT protocol, including adjusting the eligibility criteria, recalculating the sample size, conducting interventions in participants' homes, and altering the CBv assessment protocol, were proposed to address these issues. CONCLUSIONS: With the proposed modifications implemented, the RCT is deemed feasible for investigating the effectiveness of a 10-week HRV-F intervention for adults with chronic SCI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12621000870853). Registered on July 6, 2021.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoffl et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Chronic spinal cord injury (n=10). Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV-F) vs. Usual standard care was evaluated on Feasibility (randomization, safety, recruitment, retention, adherence, and data collection methods). A 10-week heart rate variability biofeedback intervention was deemed safe and feasible for adults with chronic spinal cord injury, with high adherence and retention, though recruitment and missing cerebral blood velocity data require protocol modifications for the full trial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: