Key result
HRV biofeedback enters phase 2 testing for feasibility and preliminary efficacy in Long Covid.
Why the study?
Long COVID causes persistent symptoms linked to autonomic nervous system dysregulation, and the feasibility and efficacy of HRV biofeedback in this condition are unknown.
Does Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-B) improve symptoms and autonomic function in adult Long COVID patients with palpitations or dizziness?
Does Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-B) improve symptoms and autonomic function in adult Long COVID patients with palpitations or dizziness?
This protocol outlines a feasibility study to evaluate a 4-week heart rate variability biofeedback intervention for managing dysautonomia symptoms in patients with Long COVID.
May support autonomic assessment in symptomatic long COVID; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes.
Introduction Long covid (LC), also known as Post-COVID-19 syndrome, refers to symptoms persisting 12 weeks after COVID-19 infection. It affects up to 1 in 7 people contracting the illness and causes a wide range of symptoms, including fatigue, breathlessness, palpitations, dizziness, pain and brain fog. Many of these symptoms can be linked to dysautonomia or dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system after SARS-CoV2 infection. This study aims to test the feasibility and estimate the efficacy, of the Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-B) technique via a standardised slow diaphragmatic breathing programme in individuals with LC. Methods and Analysis 30 adult LC patients with symptoms of palpitations or dizziness and an abnormal NASA Lean Test (NLT) will be selected from a specialist Long COVID rehabilitation service. They will undergo a 4-week HRV-B intervention using a Polar chest strap device linked to the Elite HRV phone application while undertaking the breathing exercise technique for two 10-min periods every day for at least 5 days a week. Quantitative data will be gathered during the study period using: HRV data from the chest strap and wrist-worn Fitbit, the modified COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRSm), composite autonomic symptom score (COMPASS 31), World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) and EQ-5D-5L health related quality of life measures. Qualitative feedback on user experience and feasibility of using the technology in a home setting will also be gathered. Standard statistical tests for correlation and significant difference will be used to analyse the quantitate data. Ethics and Dissemination The study has received ethical approval from Health Research Authority (HRA) Leicester South Research Ethics Committee (21/EM/0271). Dissemination plans include academic and lay publications. Study Registration Clinicaltrials.gov No: NCT05228665 Strengths and limitations of the study To our knowledge, this is the first study of HRVB in long covid and will provide new information regarding the feasibility of the technology-based intervention in this condition. The estimation of efficacy will determine the scope and sample size for a larger controlled trial in the condition that currently has no definitive treatments The study will provide preliminary evidence on the correlation between long covid symptoms and dysautonomia. The limitation of this study is the small sample size of 30 participants which might not give an accurate estimate of efficacy. HRV-B is a technology-based intervention, therefore its take-up could be limited in those with a lack of experience in using digital technology in daily life, particularly those from less privileged backgrounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corrado et al. (2022) studied Long Covid (n=30). Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-B) was evaluated on C19YRSm (COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale) score. Heart rate variability biofeedback is being evaluated for feasibility and preliminary efficacy in a planned 30-patient phase 2 open-label study of individuals with Long Covid, with no results reported yet.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: