Key result
Novel vacuum-based left heart simulator successfully closes mitral valves, generating ~4.1 N papillary muscle force.
Why the study?
Current in vitro left heart models limit access to the subvalvular apparatus by sealing and pressurizing the ventricular side to close the mitral valve.
A novel in vitro mitral valve model using atrial vacuum allows unrestricted access to the subvalvular apparatus while maintaining clinically relevant papillary muscle force and regurgitant flow.
May aid preclinical mitral valve research; leaves open clinical translation.
Current in vitro models of the left heart establish the pressure difference required to close the mitral valve by sealing and pressurizing the ventricular side of the valve, limiting important access to the subvalvular apparatus. This paper describes and evaluates a system that establishes physiological pressure differences across the valve using vacuum on the atrial side. The subvalvular apparatus is open to atmospheric pressure and accessible by tools and sensors, establishing a novel technique for experimentation on atrioventricular valves. Porcine mitral valves were excised and closed by vacuum within the atrial chamber. Images were used to document and analyze closure of the leaflets. Papillary muscle force and regurgitant flow rate were measured to be 4.07 N at 120 mmHg and approximately 12.1 ml/s respectively, both of which are within clinically relevant ranges. The relative ease of these measurements demonstrates the usefulness of improved ventricular access at peak pressure/force closure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephens et al. (2022) studied Mitral valve mechanics (in vitro model). Vacuum-based in vitro left heart model was evaluated on Papillary muscle force and regurgitant flow rate at 120 mmHg. A novel vacuum-based in vitro left heart model successfully closed excised porcine mitral valves, yielding a papillary muscle force of 4.07 N at 120 mmHg and an average regurgitant flow of 12.1 ml/s.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: