Key result
Six months of open-label lurasidone treatment was well-tolerated, with patients switching from risperidone experiencing reductions in mean body weight (-2.6 kg) and prolactin levels.
Why the study?
Does lurasidone improve safety and metabolic parameters in clinically stable patients with schizophrenia who continued lurasidone or switched from risperidone?
Does lurasidone improve safety and metabolic parameters in clinically stable patients with schizophrenia who continued lurasidone or switched from risperidone?
In a 6-month open-label extension, switching from risperidone to lurasidone was well-tolerated and led to reductions in weight, metabolic parameters, and prolactin levels.
Switching from risperidone to lurasidone may reverse metabolic adverse effects in schizophrenia; extends RCT evidence favoring lurasidone's metabolic safety profile.
BACKGROUND: Patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia are at an increased risk for developing metabolic syndrome, which is associated with greater cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Treatment with some commonly used antipsychotic medications may increase the risk of developing metabolic syndrome. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety of lurasidone in patients who continued lurasidone or switched from risperidone to lurasidone. A secondary aim was assessment of the effect of long-term lurasidone on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). METHODS: The treatment sample in the current study consisted of clinically stable patients with schizophrenia (N = 223) who had completed a 12-month, double-blind study of lurasidone vs. risperidone. In the current extension study, all patients received 6 months of open-label treatment with lurasidone, either continuing lurasidone assigned during the preceding double-blind trial, or switching from double-blind risperidone to lurasidone. Safety and tolerability parameters included body weight, prolactin, and metabolic laboratory tests. RESULTS: Six months of OL treatment with lurasidone was generally well-tolerated, with a low incidence of parkinsonism (4.5%) and akathisia (3.1%). Overall, few adverse events were rated as severe (4.9%), and discontinuation due to an adverse event was low in the lurasidone continuation vs. risperidone switch groups (3.7% vs. 6.9%). In the lurasidone continuation versus risperidone switch groups, change from OL baseline to 6-month endpoint (observed case) was observed in mean body weight (- 0.6 vs. -2.6 kg), median total cholesterol (- 4.0 vs. + 4.5 mg/dL), triglycerides (- 4.5 vs. -5.5 mg/dL), glucose (0.0 vs. -3.0 mg/dL) and prolactin (males, + 0.15 vs. -11.2 ng/mL; females, + 1.3 vs. -30.8 ng/mL). Improvement in PANSS total score was maintained, from OL baseline to endpoint in the continuation vs. switch groups (+ 1.0 vs. -1.0; OC). CONCLUSIONS: In this 6-month extension study, lurasidone treatment was generally well-tolerated and associated with minimal effects on weight, metabolic parameters, and prolactin levels. Patients who switched from risperidone to lurasidone experienced reductions in weight, metabolic parameters and prolactin levels commensurate with increases in these safety parameters experienced during the previous 12 months of treatment with risperidone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00641745 (Date of Registration: March 24, 2008).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mattingly et al. (2020) studied Schizophrenia (n=223). Lurasidone vs. Lurasidone continuation vs. Risperidone switch was evaluated on Safety and tolerability parameters including change in body weight, prolactin, and metabolic laboratory tests. Six months of open-label lurasidone treatment was well-tolerated, with patients switching from risperidone experiencing reductions in mean body weight (-2.6 kg) and prolactin levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: