Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Normative goal-directed hand and finger movements often follow invariant kinematics, characterized by approximate straight-line trajectories. A fundamental unresolved issue is whether movement trajectories are planned or whether they are a consequence of trajectory-free online control. We addressed this question using Spearman’s rank correlation, zero-crossings rate, and z-scores, and analyzed the time evolution of kinematic variability during the presence or absence of a task in finger and whole-arm reaching movements. We found that the central nervous system (CNS) implements control that is consistent with task-dependent trajectory regulation, where task-relevant movements showed enhanced control toward an average trajectory. Further, we found behavioral signatures of rapid kinematic control that might operate on these planned trajectories as early as ~ 60 ms in finger movements and ~ 70 ms in whole-arm reaching movements. Such early signatures of control in behavior suggest that the system could exploit a trajectory plan along with fast feedback to implement meaningful corrections during simple voluntary unperturbed movements. The analysis also revealed that the control peaked distinctly during the early (20%) and late (80–90%) phases, among both finger and arm movements, implying that the extent of trajectory control was not constant during the execution of movement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chakrabhavi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: