Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: During lambing, 10% iodine is often used to protect neonatal navel and ear tag sites. The evidence for its effectiveness is sparse. Recently, a specific navel barrier solution (NBS) was developed. Here, an in vivo field trial compared the two treatments. METHODS: Ten farms reported data from 6840 lambs. The navel and ear tag sites of alternate lambs were treated with usual care-iodine or NBS. Usual care-iodine was 10% iodine for all navels and for most ear tag sites. RESULTS: Mortality was 8.36% for the usual care-iodine group and 9.34% for the sub-group where only iodine was used for navel and ear tag sites. It was 6.51% for NBS (p < 0.004 vs. iodine groups). Mixed-effect generalised linear modelling gave an adjusted odds ratio (OR) for mortality of 0.76 for NBS (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-0.91; p = 0.003). Spraying navels was inferior to dipping them for survival (OR 2.14; 95% CI: 1.11-4.09; p = 0.02). Farmers did not report differences in joint ill between the groups. LIMITATIONS: For practical implementation, the study was non-blinded and pseudorandomised. Non-appearance of a lamb at the week 8 weighing event was taken as a sensitive and objective proxy for death. CONCLUSION: Optimal navel and ear tag site application during lambing efficiently protects against neonatal deaths. NBS is superior to 10% iodine, and dipping outperforms spraying for improvement of lamb survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lovatt et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: