Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
On 4 February 1976, a Mw 7.5 earthquake along the Motagua fault, Guatemala, ruptured ~230 km of the North American and Caribbean plate boundary. Today, the plate boundary remains poorly monitored, and the 1976 earthquake is still not fully understood. Here, we present seismic reflection profiles and radiometrically dated sediment core data from six lakes around the Motagua fault, together with reports of destruction and a quasi-dynamic rupture model, which show that the 1976 earthquake experienced strong directivity that impacted the distribution of shaking. The earthquake left behind a detailed record of event deposits (EDs) in five of the six study lakes. Thicker EDs are present in Lake Atitlán, near the terminus of the earthquake rupture, whereas thinner EDs were found in lakes off-axis of the rupture direction. We argue that EDs can be utilized to constrain asymmetrical distribution of shaking during earthquakes and that paleoseismic studies should consider directivity as a factor controlling the thickness of EDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obrist‐Farner et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: