Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A total of 204 purebred Hampshire pigs were obtained from 23 breeders. These animals were the progeny of 41 sires and 123 dams. A sample of purebred Yorkshire (n = 24) pigs were also used in the study. Animals were classified by glycolytic potential determined on a live-animal longissimus muscle biopsy sample. Hampshire pigs (n = 176) with glycolytic potential greater than 185 micromol/g (x = 238.8 micromol/g; SD = 29.54) were classified as heterozygous or homozygous for the dominant RN- allele (RN-rn+ or RN-RN-, respectively), whereas cohorts (n = 28) with glycolytic potential less than 185 micromol/g (x = 141.3 micromol/g; SD = 24.48) were considered as homozygous normal (rn+rn+). All Yorkshire pigs (n = 24) had a mean glycolytic potential level of 146.1 micromol/g (SD = 20.18) and were considered as homozygous normal (rn+rn+). The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium yielded frequencies of .630 and .370 for the dominant RN- allele and normal rn+ alleles in the Hampshire population, respectively, and genotypic frequencies of .397 (RN-RN-), .466 (RN-rn+), and .137 (rn+rn+). Hampshires with glycolytic potential > or = 185 micromol/g had significantly lower longissimus muscle ultimate pH, intramuscular fat, subjective marbling scores, and percentage of protein (P < .001) and had greater longissimus muscle percentage of moisture (P < .001), drip loss (P < .01), and cooking loss (P < .001) than rn+rn+ Hampshires and Yorkshires. These data suggest the RN- allele exists at a high frequency within the American Hampshire breed. Higher glycolytic potential levels, which accompany the allele, may cause decreased meat quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: