Key result
DOAC non-adherence in NVAF is linked to up to 866 additional ischemic strokes per 1,000 patients.
Why the study?
A third of NVAF patients are non-adherent to DOACs, and estimates of the economic value of full adherence and adherence-improving interventions are important for healthcare decision-making.
What is the clinical and economic impact of non-adherence to DOACs in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Observational
What is the clinical and economic impact of non-adherence to DOACs in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Adherence-improving interventions for DOACs in NVAF patients can be cost-saving and cost-effective by preventing ischemic strokes and years of life lost.
Adherence interventions may prove cost-effective below modest thresholds in NVAF; modeling leaves open real-world implementation value and optimal targeting.
AIMS: A third of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients are non-adherent to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Estimates of the economic value of full adherence and the cost of two types of adherence improving interventions are important to healthcare planners and decision-makers. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis estimated the impact of non-adherence over a 20-year horizon, for a patient cohort with a mean age of 77 years, based on data from the Stockholm Healthcare database of NVAF patients with incident stroke between 2011 and 2018. Adherence was defined using a medication possession ratio (MPR) cut-off of 90%; primary outcomes were the number of ischemic strokes and associated incremental cost-utility ratio. RESULTS: Hypothetical comparisons between cohorts of 1,000 patients with varying non-adherence levels and full adherence (MPR >90%) predicted an additional number of strokes ranging from 117 (MPR = 81-90%) to 866 (MPR <60%), and years of life lost ranging from 177 (MPR = 81- 90%) to 1,318 (MPR < 60%; discounted at 3%). Chronic disease co-management intervention occurring during each DOAC prescription renewal and patient education intervention at DOAC initiation will be cost-saving to the health system if its cost is below SEK 143 and SEK 4,655, and cost-effective if below SEK 858 and SEK 28,665, respectively. CONCLUSION: Adherence improving interventions for NVAF patients on DOACs such as chronic disease co-management and patient education can be cost-saving and cost-effective, within a range of costs that appear reasonable to the Swedish healthcare system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blomström‐Lundqvist et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Non-adherence to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Full adherence (MPR >90%) was evaluated on Number of ischemic strokes and associated incremental cost-utility ratio. In a modeled cohort of 1,000 NVAF patients, DOAC non-adherence predicted an additional 117 to 866 ischemic strokes and 177 to 1,318 years of life lost over 20 years compared to full adherence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: