Key result
RCT protocol evaluates hybrid diabetes self-management education for HbA1c reduction in T2D.
Why the study?
COVID-19 pandemic has threatened optimal T2DM management in primary health care due to limited patient access and lifestyle changes, necessitating effective diabetes self-management education and support.
RCT (n=200)
Open-label
Block randomization
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Telehealth supports T2DM self-care and glycemic control in PHC during access disruptions; extends RCT evidence for remote empowerment.
Introduction COVID -19 pandemic has threatened the optimal achievement on type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) target in primary health care (PHC), due to our priority in COVID-19 management, limited access of patients to PHC and their lifestyle changes as the impact of social restrictions. Therefore, the empowerment of capability of patients on diabetes self-care is required through optimal education and support. The use of telehealth in T2DM management has benefits on improving outcomes of patients. We aim to assess the role of telehealth diabetes self-management education (DSME) versus hybrid (telehealth and face-to-face method) diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) to improve T2DM outcomes in PHC during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods and analysis This study is an open label randomized-controlled trial that will be conducted in 10 PHCs in Jakarta, Indonesia, involving patients with T2DM. Subjects are classified into 2 groups: DSME group and DSMES group. Intervention will be given every 2 weeks. DSME group will receive 1 educational video every 2 weeks discussing topics about diabetes self-management, while DSMES group will receive 1 educational video and undergo 1 coaching session every 2 weeks. All interventions will be conducted by trained health workers of PHC, who are physicians, nurses, and nutritionists. Our primary outcome is the change of HbA1C level and our secondary outcomes are the changes of nutritional intake, physical activity, quality of life, anthropometric parameter, fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, inflammatory markers, and progression of diabetes complications at 3 and 6 months after intervention compare to the baseline. Ethics and dissemination This study protocol has been approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee University of Indonesia. Subjects agree to participate will be given written informed consent prior to data collection. Findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. Trial Registration http://www.clinicalstrials.gov with identifier number NCT05090488 . Summary Strengths and limitations of the study This study evaluates the role of hybrid DSMES, which is useful in areas with limited access or on lockdowns. This study will evaluates the implementation of hybrid DSMES, its benefits, difficulties, and obstacles. We uses validated questionnaire instruments and routinely collected clinical data. Because all of our interventions will be conducted by PHCs’ health workers, our results depend on the ability and adherence of PHCs’ health workers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yunir et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=200). Hybrid diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) vs. Telehealth diabetes self-management education (DSME) was evaluated on Change in HbA1C level at 3 and 6 months. As a protocol paper, no clinical results are yet available regarding the efficacy of hybrid diabetes self-management education and support on HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: