Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a novel primary epithelial cell toxicity assay using porcine corneal explant and evaluate the assay using benzalkonium chloride (BAK). METHODS: Circular corneal explants were trephined from the peripheral cornea of porcine eyes using 2-mm biopsy punches, and placed on 6-well culture dishes with a culture medium. After incubation for 12 hours, 50 μL of BAK at 0.00001%, 0.0001%, 0.001%, or 0.01% was applied to each well for 2 minutes. After washing, explants were cultured for another 24 hours, then epithelial outgrowth was photographed and measured. Corneal immunohistochemical characteristics were evaluated by cytokeratin (CK) 3, CK12, and ZO-1. Cell toxicity was evaluated by WST-8 assay, Ki-67 staining, and TUNEL assay. RESULTS: Epithelial cells migrated outward concentrically from the corneal explant as time elapsed and were positive for CK3, CK12, and ZO-1. The outgrowth rate decreased significantly with 0.0001%, 0.001%, and 0.01% BAK compared with the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) control (P < 0.01), and the decrease was BAK concentration dependent. Numbers of viable cells and Ki-67-positive cells also decreased significantly with 0.01% BAK compared with the PBS control (P < 0.05). TUNEL-positive cells were present in the epithelial outgrowth. Moreover, TUNEL-positive cell density tended to increase with 0.01% BAK compared with the PBS control (P = 0.14) and 0.00001% BAK (P = 0.081). CONCLUSIONS: Our novel toxicity assay using porcine corneal explant is simple and reflects the effect of single and short-duration instillation of eye drops. The method is useful for evaluation of corneal toxicity at low concentrations of BAK.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahashi et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: