Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Despite national efforts toward measles elimination, the disease remains a significant public health challenge in The Gambia. Recurrent outbreaks are driven by suboptimal vaccination coverage, consistently falling below the 95% herd immunity threshold. This study analysed years of national surveillance data (2014–2024) to assess the epidemiology, vaccine impact, and performance of the national measles surveillance system. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cross-sectional study using the national vaccine-preventable disease (VPD) surveillance database. A total of 1,266 suspected cases were analysed. Annual incidence rates per million population were calculated, and surveillance performance was evaluated against WHO-AFRO benchmarks. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify independent predictors of laboratory-confirmed (IgM+) measles. Results: Of the 1,266 cases, 238 (18.8%) were laboratory-confirmed. The highest incidence was recorded in 2015 (32.8 cases per million), significantly exceeding the WHO elimination target of < 1 per million. The sensitivity of the surveillance system, measured by the non-measles febrile rash illness (NMFRI) rate, met the WHO benchmark of ≥ 2 per 100,000 population in nine out of the eleven years studied. Children aged 1–5 years represented 41.6% of confirmed cases. A strong dose-dependent protective effect was observed: receipt of ≥ 2 doses was associated with an 88.8% reduction in the odds of infection (aOR: 0.11; 95%CI: 0.06–0.20; p < 0.001). Geographically, Western Region 1 (WR1) and Western Region 2 (WR2) were identified as the primary epicentres. While the system met targets for notification (89%) and investigation (97%), sample transportation timeliness was critically low in the Upper River Region (46%). Conclusion: The Gambian measles surveillance system is sensitive and timely in detection; however, persistent transmission is associated with an immunity gap among young children in urban hotspots. The disparity in sample transportation logistics for remote regions like the Upper River Region poses a risk of delayed outbreak confirmation. We recommend that the Ministry of Health prioritise “mop-up” vaccination campaigns and supplementary immunisation activities (SIAs) specifically in Western Regions 1 and 2 to address urban transmission. Furthermore, a dedicated logistics framework must be established to improve sample transport timeliness in the Upper River Region to meet the national 5-day laboratory receipt benchmark.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janneh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: