Key result
Renal impairment increases enalaprilat exposure ~80% but does not alter benazeprilat levels.
Why the study?
The effects of moderate experimental renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of enalapril, benazepril, and their active metabolites were not well characterized.
Does moderate experimental renal impairment alter the pharmacokinetics of orally administered enalapril and benazepril in dogs?
RCT (n=10)
randomly assigned
Does moderate experimental renal impairment alter the pharmacokinetics of orally administered enalapril and benazepril in dogs?
Exposure to enalaprilat, but not benazeprilat, is significantly increased in dogs with subclinical renal impairment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Renal impairment may increase enalaprilat exposure; leaves open differential ACE inhibitor pharmacokinetics in experimental models.
The pharmacokinetics of benazepril, enalapril, and their active metabolites (benazeprilat and enalaprilat) were compared after a single administration of each product by the oral route at the recommended dosage (0.5 mg/kg for both drugs) in the dog before and after moderate experimental renal impairment. Ten dogs were randomly assigned to 2 groups of 5 animals in a 2-period crossover design for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor administration. Renal failure was surgically induced by right ne-phrectomy and electrocoagulation of the remaining kidney. Renal mass reduction induced a significant decrease (P < .001) in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (1.7 ± 0.3 versus 3.3 ± 0.7 mL/kg/minute). No significant differences before and after surgery were observed for enalapril and benazepril kinetics. The area under the curve (AUC) for enalaprilat increased after surgery from 23.6 ± 14.7 to 42.4 ± 20.9 μg-minute/mL (P < .01). Mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was increased in the impaired dogs (59.1 ± 23.3 versus 43.9 ± 32.9 ng/mL), but this variation was not significant (P > .05). Renal failure had no significant effect on AUC for benazeprilat (13.8 ± 9.8 versus 14.9 ± 5.0 μg-minute/mL) (P > .05), but Cmax decreased significantly (from 55.0 ± 26.4 to 31.9 ± 17.7 ng/mL) (P < .05). Multiple regression analysis showed that both GFR and AUC for enalapril were highly significant variables that explained the variation in AUC for enalaprilat (R2= .86, P < .001) but not for benazeprilat (R2= .12, P > .05). The results of this study indicate that exposure to enalaprilat, but not to benazeprilat, is increased in dogs with subclinical renal impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lefebvre et al. (1999) conducted an RCT in experimental renal impairment (n=10). Enalapril and Benazepril vs. Before renal impairment was evaluated on Area under the curve (AUC) for enalaprilat (p=<.01). Experimental renal impairment significantly increased the area under the curve for enalaprilat from 23.6 to 42.4 μg-minute/mL (P<0.01), but had no significant effect on benazeprilat.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: