Key result
DOAC trials in pediatric VTE face key trial design hurdles despite expanding therapeutic opportunities.
Why the study?
Anticoagulant use in pediatric VTE is common despite lack of FDA approval and guidelines are largely extrapolated from adult trials and limited pediatric data.
This perspective highlights the challenges and opportunities in generating robust evidence for the use of direct oral anticoagulants in pediatric venous thromboembolism.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increasingly diagnosed in pediatric patients, and anticoagulant use in this population has become common, despite the absence of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for this indication. Guidelines for the use of anticoagulants in pediatrics are largely extrapolated from large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults, smaller dose-finding and observational studies in children, and expert opinion. The recently FDA-approved direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, provide potential advantages over oral vitamin K antagonists and subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). However, key questions arise regarding their potential off-label clinical application in pediatric thromboembolic disease. In this Perspective, we provide background on the use of LMWHs such as enoxaparin as the mainstay of treatment of pediatric provoked VTE; identify key questions and challenges with regard to DOAC trials and future DOAC therapy in pediatric VTE; and discuss applicable lessons learned from the recent pilot/feasibility phase of a large multicenter RCT of anticoagulant duration in pediatric VTE. The challenges and lessons learned present opportunities to improve evidence for anticoagulant therapies in pediatric VTE through future clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldenberg et al. (2015) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children. Anticoagulant therapies (DOACs, LMWHs) was evaluated. This perspective highlights the challenges and opportunities for future clinical trials evaluating direct oral anticoagulants and other therapies for pediatric venous thromboembolism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: