Key result
Teaching Simpson biplane method improves resident LVEF assessment accuracy by ~2.5% over visual estimation.
Why the study?
There is no consensus on the most effective method for teaching anesthesiology residents to assess LVEF using echocardiography.
Does teaching quantitative LVEF assessment improve LVEF estimation accuracy in anesthesiology residents?
Does teaching quantitative LVEF assessment improve LVEF estimation accuracy in anesthesiology residents?
Teaching quantitative echocardiography methods like the Simpson biplane method improves the accuracy of LVEF assessment by anesthesiology residents compared to visual estimation alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative LVEF training is feasible for anesthesiology residents; leaves open optimal teaching methods and clinical impact.
Background: The use of echocardiography to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an important component of anesthesiology resident education; however, there is no consensus on the most effective method for teaching this skill set. This study investigates the impact and feasibility of teaching a quantitative LVEF assessment method to anesthesiology residents, compared with teaching visual estimation techniques. Methods: We included all anesthesiology residents rotating through cardiac anesthesia at our institution from August 2020 through March 2021. Participants completed a pretest to assess baseline ability to accurately estimate LVEF. All tests consisted of transthoracic echocardiography images with standard views from 10 patients. Participants were assigned to either a control group that received teaching on visual estimation of LVEF or an intervention group that was taught quantitative LVEF assessment with the Simpson biplane method of discs. After 4 weeks, all participants were administered a postteaching exam. A retention exam was administered an additional 4 weeks later. LVEF accuracy was measured as the absolute difference between their LVEF estimation and the reference value. Results: Addition of quantitative LVEF assessment to traditional teaching of visual LVEF estimation methods significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of anesthesiology residents' left ventricular systolic function assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2022) studied Anesthesiology resident education in echocardiography (n=28). Quantitative measurement of LVEF using the Simpson biplane method of discs vs. Visual estimation of LVEF (qualitative assessment) was evaluated on Accuracy of LVEF assessment on the postteaching exam (absolute difference from reference value) (MD 2.54%, 95% CI 0.90-4.19, p=0.003). Teaching anesthesiology residents quantitative LVEF assessment using the Simpson biplane method significantly improved their diagnostic accuracy compared to visual estimation, with a mean difference of 2.54%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: