Key result
Paired-pulse stimulation yielded H-reflex depression estimates comparable to traditional ten-pulse trains (p>0.05) with high between-day reliability (r2=0.97, ICC=0.81).
Why the study?
Does paired-pulse stimulation adequately estimate H-reflex depression compared to ten-pulse trains in healthy active humans?
Does paired-pulse stimulation adequately estimate H-reflex depression compared to ten-pulse trains in healthy active humans?
Effect estimate: r2 = 0.97, ICC = 0.81
p-value: p=>0.05
Paired-pulse H-reflex depression is highly reliable and yields comparable estimates to traditional ten-pulse trains, allowing for more rapid assessment of motor neuronal excitability.
Paired-pulse H-reflex testing may enable faster motoneuron excitability assessment in healthy adults; leaves open validation and clinical translation.
Depression of the Hoffman reflex (H-reflex) is used to examine spinal control mechanisms during exercise, fatigue, and vibration and in response to training. H-reflex depression protocols frequently use trains of stimuli; this is time-consuming and prevents instantaneous assessment of motor neuronal excitability. The purpose of this study was to determine if paired-pulse H-reflex depression is reproducible and whether paired-pulse stimulation adequately estimates the depression induced by the more traditional ten-pulse train. H-reflexes were elicited via ten-pulse trains at 0.1, 0.2, 1, 2, and 5 Hz in ten neurologically intact individuals on two separate days. We measured the depression elicited by the second pulse (H2) and the mean depression elicited by pulses 2–10 (Hmean). H2 was consistent at all frequencies on both days ( r 2 = 0.97, p < 0.05 , and I C C ( 3 , 1 ) = 0.81). H2 did not differ from Hmean ( p > 0.05 ). The results indicate that paired-pulse H-reflex depression has high between-day reliability and yields depression estimates that are comparable to those obtained via ten-pulse trains. Paired-pulse H-reflex depression may be especially useful for studies that require rapid assessment of motor neuronal excitability, such as during exercise, fatigue, and vibration, or to establish recovery curves following inhibition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oza et al. (2017) studied Healthy active humans (n=10). Paired-pulse stimulation vs. Ten-pulse train stimulation was evaluated on Depression elicited by the second pulse (H2) compared to mean depression elicited by pulses 2-10 (Hmean) (r2 = 0.97, ICC = 0.81, p=>0.05). Paired-pulse stimulation yielded H-reflex depression estimates comparable to traditional ten-pulse trains (p>0.05) with high between-day reliability (r2=0.97, ICC=0.81).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: